June 22, 2005

Bush's Flypaper Strategy

Essayist David Warren explores Bush's Flypaper strategy against the terrorists and finds it is winning.

I do feel sure, that while the continuing terrorist carnage in Iraq, especially, but also in Afghanistan, must disturb us as conscientious human beings, we have less reason than ever to be alarmed by it. We are witnessing what amounts to the purposeful bleeding of a septic wound, as the most fanatic Islamist incendiaries from within Iraq and abroad take their best, hopeless shot at bringing down the new Iraqi constitutional order. It is a matter of life or death for their cause, and we could hardly expect them to abandon it easily.

As the author of the much-mocked "flypaper theory" -- the phrase I used to describe the implicit strategy behind the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan -- I am more and more persuaded it has worked. All ground indications are that large numbers of Islamist terrorists who would otherwise remain dangerously under cover, not only across the region but in Europe and elsewhere, are irresistibly drawn towards these theatres of action, where they sooner or later get themselves killed.

As terrorists, they were, almost invariably, in a position to be more effective where they were. They are lured away for emotional reasons, or "spiritual" if that word can be applied to something that is essentially not Godly but demonic. It is the Islamist analogy to the way young socialists, anarchists, and adventurers from across Europe were drawn to Spain during its Civil War in the 1930s.

In addition to being annihilated, themselves, they deflate their cause by showing it to be losing. And what began as a recruiting inducement, soon becomes the opposite. For the near-certainty of getting killed oneself, in the cause of murdering (mostly) defenceless civilians, is not as attractive a motivator as the incendiaries make out.

In the longer term, Iraq and subsequent budding Middle Eastern democracies become a draw to the opposite sort of adventurer: the much larger numbers of Arabs, Turks, Persians and other Muslims who had emigrated because there was neither opportunity nor freedom back home. Most people will, when prospects are good, remain in or return to their own countries. The exceptional cases do eventually assimilate abroad.

For these reasons I think the struggle against violent Islamism, though it will take years more to complete, during which there will of course be plenty more carnage, is already won. And we are right to turn our principal attention towards the greater dangers offered by such rogue states as Iran, North Korea, and possibly Saudi Arabia, as they pursue nuclear weapons.

Posted by Ted at June 22, 2005 8:48 PM